DECEMBER 13, 2017
“Recent evidence from animal and human studies shows that its use could have some therapeutic value for seizures due to epilepsy and related conditions. Current evidence also shows that cannabidiol is not likely to be abused or create dependence as for other cannabinoids (such as Tetra Hydro Cannabinol (THC), for instance),” reads an announcement from the WHO Expert Committee on Drug Dependence.
CBD has shown that it has medical benefits for epileptic seizures, pain, insomnia and inflammation, among other afflictions; it can be derived from both psychoactive cannabis and hemp. According to the WHO report, there is also preliminary evidence that it can treat Alzheimer’s disease, Crohn’s disease, certain forms of cancer, Parkinson’s disease and other serious conditions.
Although processed and sold without regulation in America, hemp-derived CBD remains a Schedule I substance with the federal government, because it’s classified under the same branch as psychoactive cannabis. However, CBD derived from industrial hemp, a member of the cannabis family that has less than 0.3 percent THC, doesn’t carry psychoactive or addictive effects, according to the study.
WHO found that CBD offers medical benefits for both humans and animals without a risk of addiction. “In an animal drug discrimination model, CBD failed to substitute for THC. In humans, CBD exhibits no effects indicative of any abuse or dependence potential,” the report reads. “To date, there is no evidence of recreational use of CBD or any public health-related problems associated with the use of pure CBD.”
Raul Elizalde, a medical marijuana advocate in Mexico, spoke at a World Health Organization meeting in November to urge WHO not to schedule CBD. – CMW Media
Raul Elizalde, a medical marijuana advocate who’s president of hemp-CBD company HempMeds Mexico, spoke with WHO during its 39th annual meeting of the Expert Committee on Drug Dependence in November. Elizalde helped spearhead Mexico’s legalization of medical marijuana with less than 1 percent THC in June, and hoped to persuade WHO to do something similar by not acting — or in this case, not scheduling.
“If CBD was scheduled as a drug, the only way CBD would have been available is as a pharmaceutical,” he told us before the WHO decision came down. “Drugs are scheduled for being psychoactive, addictive or damaging to people’s health. This wouldn’t be available to a lot of patients that it used to be available to around the world if scheduled.”